Screener
BFLX vs GLOF
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.20% less per year.
- BFLX follows a active selection strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $196M |
| Since | 2026 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | 0.00% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and GLOF
Explore further