Screener
BFOR vs CPLS
Barron's 400 ETF vs AB Core Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- CPLS costs 0.35% less per year.
- BFOR is classified as equity, while CPLS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFOR covers north america markets; CPLS covers global.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; CPLS uses active selection.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | CPLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $216M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 4.65% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 3.91% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -4.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and CPLS
Explore further