Screener
BFOR vs EYEG
Barron's 400 ETF vs AB Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- EYEG costs 0.35% less per year.
- BFOR is significantly larger than EYEG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR is classified as equity, while EYEG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; EYEG uses multi strategy.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | EYEG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $26M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 4.98% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -4.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and EYEG
Explore further