Screener
BFOR vs DCOR
Barron's 400 ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.51% less per year.
- DCOR is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and DCOR
Explore further