Screener
BFOR vs DFAU
Barron's 400 ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
Key differences
- DFAU costs 0.53% less per year.
- DFAU is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; DFAU uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | DFAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2013 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 12.21% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -23.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and DFAU
Explore further