Screener
BFOR vs FIVA
Barron's 400 ETF vs Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.47% less per year.
- BFOR covers north america markets; FIVA covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, FIVA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $533M |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -39.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and FIVA
Explore further