Screener
BFOR vs FLQM
Barron's 400 ETF vs Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- FLQM costs 0.35% less per year.
- FLQM is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and FLQM
Explore further