Screener
BFOR vs GGUS
Barron's 400 ETF vs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- GGUS costs 0.53% less per year.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | GGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $423M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 15.09% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -22.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and GGUS
Explore further