Screener
BFOR vs GSLC
Barron's 400 ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.56% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, GSLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $15.0B |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 11.86% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and GSLC
Explore further