Screener
BFOR vs GSIE
Barron's 400 ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSIE costs 0.40% less per year.
- GSIE is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR covers north america markets; GSIE covers global.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $5.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 14.21% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -34.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and GSIE
Explore further