Screener
BFOR vs IWY
Barron's 400 ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.45% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $16.5B |
| Since | 2013 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +17.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 15.60% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -32.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and IWY
Explore further