Screener
BFOR vs KORP
Barron's 400 ETF vs American Century Diversified Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- KORP costs 0.36% less per year.
- KORP is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR is classified as equity, while KORP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFOR covers north america markets; KORP covers global.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; KORP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | KORP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $799M |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 5.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 4.47% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -14.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and KORP
Explore further