Screener
BFOR vs OMFS
Barron's 400 ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFS costs 0.26% less per year.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $275M |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and OMFS
Explore further