Screener
BFOR vs VFVA
Barron's 400 ETF vs Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares
Key differences
- VFVA costs 0.52% less per year.
- VFVA is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; VFVA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | VFVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $815M |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +32.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 15.51% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -48.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and VFVA
Explore further