Screener
BFXU vs FAUG
FT Vest Laddered U.S. Equity Un vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- FAUG costs 0.10% less per year.
- FAUG is significantly larger than BFXU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAUG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFXU | FAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.39% |
| Max drawdown | -2.41% | -22.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFXU and FAUG
Explore further