Screener
BFXU vs FOCT
FT Vest Laddered U.S. Equity Un vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October
Key differences
- FOCT costs 0.10% less per year.
- FOCT is significantly larger than BFXU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FOCT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFXU | FOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2026 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.14% |
| Max drawdown | -2.41% | -14.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFXU and FOCT
Explore further