Screener
BGIA vs KAT
Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
Both BGIA and KAT are equity ETFs. BGIA charges 0.59% a year and KAT 0.75%. The main difference: BGIA costs 0.16% less per year.
- BGIA costs 0.16% less per year.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGIA | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $682M |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.27% | -9.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.