Screener
KAT vs FFND
Scharf ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
Both KAT and FFND are equity ETFs. KAT charges 0.75% a year and FFND 1.00%. The main difference: KAT costs 0.25% less per year.
- KAT costs 0.25% less per year.
- KAT is much larger than FFND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $682M | $103M |
| Since | 2011 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -47.84% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.