Screener
BGRO vs DIVB
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs iShares Core Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.50% less per year.
- DIVB is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO is classified as alternative, while DIVB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BGRO follows a active selection strategy; DIVB uses index tracking.
- DIVB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | DIVB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.2% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.05% | 11.33% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -36.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and DIVB
Explore further