Screener
BGRO vs HDV
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs iShares Core High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- HDV costs 0.47% less per year.
- HDV is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO is classified as alternative, while HDV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BGRO follows a active selection strategy; HDV uses index tracking.
- HDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | HDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 2.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.2% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.05% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -37.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and HDV
Explore further