Screener
BGRO vs MATE
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
Both BGRO and MATE are alternative ETFs. BGRO charges 0.55% a year and MATE 0.97%. The main difference: BGRO follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- BGRO follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- BGRO covers North America; MATE covers emerging markets.
- BGRO costs 0.42% less per year.
- MATE is much larger than BGRO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $39M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.