Screener
BGRO vs XNAV
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
Both BGRO and XNAV are alternative ETFs. BGRO charges 0.55% a year and XNAV 1.27%. The main difference: BGRO costs 0.72% less per year.
- BGRO costs 0.72% less per year.
- XNAV is much larger than BGRO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $34M |
| Since | 2024 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.88% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.