Screener
XNAV vs MANI
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | — |
| Since | 2002 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and MANI
Explore further