Screener
BHDG vs QTR
Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
- BHDG costs 0.25% less per year.
- BHDG is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BHDG follows a option income strategy; QTR uses volatility strategy.
- QTR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BHDG | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $3M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 17.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.14% |
| Max drawdown | -15.07% | -31.72% |
Similar to BHDG and QTR
Explore further