Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

QTR vs TAIL

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Cambria Tail Risk ETF

QTR

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$3M

TAIL

Cambria Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$157M

Key differences

  • QTR costs 0.34% less per year.
  • TAIL is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • QTR follows a volatility strategy strategy; TAIL uses tactical allocation.
  • Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

QTRTAIL
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$3M$157M
Since20212017
Dividend yield17.74%3.41%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyvolatility strategytactical allocation
CAGR 1Y+34.8%-9.0%
CAGR 3Y+25.2%-6.3%
CAGR 5YN/A-8.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.25-0.64
Volatility 1Y14.14%8.55%
Max drawdown-31.72%-52.37%

Similar to QTR and TAIL