Screener
BIBL vs ISMD
Inspire 100 ETF vs Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.18% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIBL | ISMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $292M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.2% | +37.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.38% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -36.12% | -43.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BIBL and ISMD
Explore further