Screener
BIBL vs PTL
Inspire 100 ETF vs Inspire 500 ETF
Key differences
- PTL costs 0.26% less per year.
- BIBL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIBL | PTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $799M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.2% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.38% | 14.69% |
| Max drawdown | -36.12% | -19.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BIBL and PTL
Explore further