Screener
BIDD vs IGF
iShares International Dividend Active ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.20% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BIDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BIDD follows a active selection strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- BIDD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIDD | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $438M | $10.7B |
| Since | 1997 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.3% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.27% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -15.08% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BIDD and IGF
Explore further