Screener
IGF vs IGRO
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- IGRO costs 0.24% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than IGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | IGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 2.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 12.51% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -36.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and IGRO
Explore further