Screener
BIDD vs PFM
iShares International Dividend Active ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- PFM costs 0.07% less per year.
- BIDD covers global markets; PFM covers north america.
- BIDD follows a active selection strategy; PFM uses index tracking.
- BIDD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIDD | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $438M | $764M |
| Since | 1997 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.6% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.16% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -15.08% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BIDD and PFM
Explore further