Screener
BILT vs IDGT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- IDGT costs 0.21% less per year.
- IDGT is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BILT follows a active selection strategy; IDGT uses index tracking.
- IDGT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | IDGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $275M |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +61.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.21% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -36.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BILT and IDGT
Explore further