Screener
BILT vs IUSB
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IUSB costs 0.54% less per year.
- IUSB is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BILT is classified as equity, while IUSB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BILT follows a active selection strategy; IUSB uses index tracking.
- IUSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | IUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $36.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.24% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.66% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -17.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BILT and IUSB
Explore further