Skip to content
Screener

BINC vs BRLN

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.8B

BRLN

iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$54M

Key differences

Both BINC and BRLN are fixed income ETFs. BINC charges 0.40% a year and BRLN 0.55%. The main difference: BINC costs 0.15% less per year.

  • BINC costs 0.15% less per year.
  • BINC is much larger than BRLN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

BINCBRLN
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.55%
Fund size (AUM)$16.8B$54M
Since20232022
Dividend yield5.54%6.40%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.5%+4.8%
CAGR 3Y+6.9%+7.4%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.061.07
Volatility 1Y2.28%3.14%
Max drawdown-2.69%-3.85%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BINC and BRLN