Screener
BRLN vs FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF vs iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
Key differences
- FLOT costs 0.40% less per year.
- FLOT is significantly larger than BRLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BRLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FLOT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BRLN | FLOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $9.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.51% | 4.66% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 0.74% |
| Max drawdown | -3.85% | -13.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BRLN and FLOT
Explore further