Skip to content
Screener

BINC vs EYEG

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs AB Corporate Bond ETF

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.8B

EYEG

AB Corporate Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$27M

Key differences

Both BINC and EYEG are fixed income ETFs. BINC charges 0.40% a year and EYEG 0.30%. The main difference: BINC follows a active selection strategy; EYEG uses multi strategy.

  • BINC follows a active selection strategy; EYEG uses multi strategy.
  • EYEG costs 0.10% less per year.
  • BINC is much larger than EYEG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

BINCEYEG
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.30%
Fund size (AUM)$16.8B$27M
Since20232023
Dividend yield5.54%4.94%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Region
Strategyactive selectionmulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+5.7%+5.5%
CAGR 3Y+7.1%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.13N/A
Volatility 1Y2.30%4.36%
Max drawdown-2.69%-4.66%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BINC and EYEG