Skip to content
Screener

BINC vs FORH

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Formidable ETF

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.8B

FORH

Formidable ETF

Annual cost

1.19%

Fund size

$20M

Key differences

BINC is a fixed income ETF, while FORH is an alternative ETF. BINC charges 0.40% a year and FORH 1.19%.

  • BINC is a fixed income fund, while FORH is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BINC follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
  • BINC costs 0.79% less per year.
  • BINC is much larger than FORH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BINC has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

BINCFORH
Annual cost (TER)0.40%1.19%
Fund size (AUM)$16.8B$20M
Since20232021
Dividend yield5.54%1.73%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Region
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+5.5%+10.3%
CAGR 3Y+6.9%+3.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+0.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.060.07
Volatility 1Y2.28%15.96%
Max drawdown-2.69%-20.73%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BINC and FORH