Screener
BINC vs KONG
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
BINC is a fixed income ETF, while KONG is an alternative ETF. BINC charges 0.40% a year and KONG 0.89%.
- BINC is a fixed income fund, while KONG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- BINC costs 0.49% less per year.
- BINC is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, KONG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.8B | $22M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.54% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.9% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -19.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.