Screener
BINC vs LMBS
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- BINC costs 0.26% less per year.
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; LMBS uses index tracking.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | LMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.9B | $6.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 4.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.29% | 1.98% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -6.48% |
Similar to BINC and LMBS
Explore further