Screener
LMBS vs LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
Key differences
- LMBS costs 0.11% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than LDSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LMBS follows a index tracking strategy; LDSF uses active selection.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LMBS | LDSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $160M |
| Since | 2014 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.09% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.96% | 2.05% |
| Max drawdown | -6.48% | -8.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LMBS and LDSF
Explore further