Screener
BITI vs EFU
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- EFU costs 0.06% less per year.
- BITI is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITI is classified as cryptocurrency, while EFU is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EFU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITI | EFU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $187M | $0.9M |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 9.25% | 5.18% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | -32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -37.3% | -23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.77 | -0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.05% | 31.13% |
| Max drawdown | -92.16% | -90.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITI and EFU
Explore further