Screener
BITI vs EFZ
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF vs ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- EFZ costs 0.06% less per year.
- BITI is significantly larger than EFZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITI is classified as cryptocurrency, while EFZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EFZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITI | EFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $187M | $16M |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 9.25% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | -15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -37.3% | -9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.77 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.05% | 16.44% |
| Max drawdown | -92.16% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITI and EFZ
Explore further