Screener
BITO vs BCCC
ProShares Bitcoin ETF vs Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- BCCC costs 0.20% less per year.
- BITO is significantly larger than BCCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITO is classified as cryptocurrency, while BCCC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITO | BCCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $10M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 71.92% | — |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -33.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.21% | — |
| Max drawdown | -77.86% | -42.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITO and BCCC
Explore further