Screener
BITS vs IPAV
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
Key differences
- IPAV costs 0.10% less per year.
- BITS is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITS is classified as cryptocurrency, while IPAV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BITS follows a active selection strategy; IPAV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITS | IPAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $5M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 22.55% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.62% | 17.09% |
| Max drawdown | -83.11% | -14.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITS and IPAV
Explore further