Screener
IPAV vs RIFR
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- RIFR is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAV follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAV | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $42M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.97% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAV and RIFR
Explore further