Screener
BKCH vs FFND
Global X Blockchain ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.50% less per year.
- BKCH is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKCH follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $99M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.8% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +57.3% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.50% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKCH and FFND
Explore further