Screener
BKCH vs IGF
Global X Blockchain ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.11% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKCH covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +108.0% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +61.1% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.40% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKCH and IGF
Explore further