Screener
BKCH vs RIFR
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.09% less per year.
- BKCH is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKCH covers north america markets; RIFR covers global.
- BKCH follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $42M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +108.0% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +61.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.40% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKCH and RIFR
Explore further