Screener
BKCH vs QYLD
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.10% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKCH is classified as equity, while QYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BKCH follows a index tracking strategy; QYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $8.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 11.47% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +108.0% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +61.1% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.40% | 8.72% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKCH and QYLD
Explore further