Screener
BKCH vs XYLD
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.10% less per year.
- XYLD is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKCH is classified as equity, while XYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BKCH follows a index tracking strategy; XYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | XYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.8% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +57.3% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.50% | 6.73% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -33.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKCH and XYLD
Explore further