Screener
BKCH vs RYLG
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.15% less per year.
- BKCH is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKCH is classified as equity, while RYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BKCH follows a index tracking strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKCH | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $314M | $8M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.8% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +57.3% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 70.50% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -91.80% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKCH and RYLG
Explore further